Thursday, May 14, 2015
Sunday, May 10, 2015
THE NAPAFICATION OF SEBASTOPOL...
Yukking it up on a pick-up truck, while...
Lining their pockets at our expense. |
...draining the Laguna de Santa Rosa and quadrupling traffic in Sebastopol.
Imagine this just outside of town. |
Above is the family responsible for the plans to build a massive winery event center on the Laguna de Santa Rosa just outside of town.
The proposed site. |
Please see previous posts and write to the appropriate officials.
Thanks,
theGranvenstien
AN ARTICLE BY SHEPHERD BLISS...
Big Wine Blasted at North Coast
California Gathering
By
Shepherd Bliss
In
the heart of what corporate wine industry lobbyists have re-branded “Wine
Country,” activists from four North Coast California counties gathered in early
May for their third monthly meeting. They created a regional network of groups
from Sonoma, Napa, Lake, and Mendocino counties.
Participants
came to the attractive resort town of Calistoga in Napa to discuss how to
contain the rampant, sprawling growth of corporate vineyards and wineries as
commercial, industrial event centers. They pave over agricultural land, damage
the quality of rural life, and create multiple negative impacts upon the
environment with respect to water, land, noise, traffic, wildlife habitat, and
air quality.
Historic Calistoga, CA |
Members
of various national, state, regional, and local groups attended, including the
following: Sierra Club, Napa County Farm Bureau, Community Alliance with Family
Farmers, Greenbelt Alliance, the Grange, Napa Vision 2050, Sonoma County Water
Coalition, Sonoma County Conservation Action, and Preserve Rural Sonoma County.
Various grape growers and wine makers attended and spoke up. A former planning
commissioner, organic farmers, environmentalists, and a professional planner
spoke.
“What
we have in common is respect for rural life,” co-host Donald Williams welcomed the
by-invitation-only crowd. “The reasons for this meeting include becoming acquainted
with each other and hearing our stories. Another goal is to encourage and
inspire each other.”
DON’T
LET WINERIES PAVE OVER AG LAND
“Things
have changed dramatically since I moved here in 1965, when we had diverse
agriculture,” said Bob Dwyer, one of a dozen featured speakers. He was the
Executive Director of the Napa Valley Grape Growers Association, the Napa
County Farm Bureau, and the Napa Valley Vintner’s Association.
“Now
we have little here other than a wine grape mono-culture. A ten-mile stretch of
the Silverado Trail has eighteen wineries. They hire a chef before a
wine-maker. This has to stop. We cannot let them pave over more of our ag land.
The event centers have nothing to do with agriculture,” added Dwyer.
Napa Wineries |
Current
Napa Farm Bureau President Norma Tofanelli--a fourth-generation farmer and
grape grower--read from that group’s mission statement, which is “to preserve
agricultural land and natural resources.”
“Napa
County--the leader with the nation's first agricultural preserve--faces
fundamental questions on how to protect ag lands and resources,” Tofanelli
said. “Planning Commissioner Matt Pope has asked ‘Do we want to maintain an
agricultural economy that benefits from tourism or do we want to transfer into
a tourist economy that capitalizes on agriculture?" according to Tofanelli.
“Ag-washing is when you say a winery
with hospitality events is agriculture. It is not. We have an Agricultural
Preserve here in Napa,” observed Geoff Ellsworth of St. Helena, which he said needs to be
supported.
“Wineries as event centers are being put
on ag lands in rural areas, rather than in municipalities. When
they are put into towns or cities, they should still adhere to the codes of
that municipality and address community and environmental impacts in order for
balance to be maintained,” Ellsworth added.
It's not about wine anymore. |
“We
need to have a state-wide movement,” declared Sonoma County’s Janus Matthes of
the Community Alliance with Family Farmers. “Rules need to be set for the wine
industry, so that everyone knows what they can and cannot do. Neighbors report
that real estate prices go down when wineries as event centers move in,”
Matthes noted.
NAPA VISION 2050 AND LAKE COUNTY THREATS
“We
need a valley-wide voice,” commented David Hallett of the Napa Vision 2050, a
coalition of 15 groups, including the Sierra Club. He recommended that people
“go find your commonality and get organized.”
“A big vintner wanted to put in a winery
in the hills behind my back yard in a known water-deprived area,”
explained Dan Mufson of Napa Vision 2050. “They would cut down 28,000 trees.”
He was able to rally neighbors to raise community awareness of this and
then other projects.
“Lake
County is in a different cycle of winery development,” said Julie Kreis of Lake
County’s Hidden Valley Lake Watershed (HVL) group. They focus on new vineyards
wanting to move in, as land and water become scarcer in Sonoma and Napa
counties. Kreis owns eleven acres bordering a
6,000-person subdivision, which makes it the second largest population
concentration in the small county of 63,860 people in 2013.
“The Wild Diamond Vineyard has an application
to plant 108 acres of vines on a steep
mountainside parcel with moderate to severe erosion and run-off that goes into
Hidden Valley Lake,” noted Kreis. “HVL Watershed is concerned about
depletion of wells and spring recharge. It's critical to address corporate
vineyard development that clear cuts the land of trees, negatively impacts
water resources, pollutes water and air, and destroys natural habitat,”
added Kreis.
“We’ve felt isolated and lonely fighting
Big Wine,” commented Greg Stratmann, who co-owns Stonehouse Cellars winery in Lake
County. He represented the Old Long Valley Road community of some 50
households, “two of which were pumping air from their wells a week after a
nearby winery started irrigating this year.”
Stratmann reported on a struggle with Shannon
Ranches, which put in a large reservoir without a
permit. “The county does not enforce its laws, so vineyards can do what they
want and then pay minimal fines. Shannon waters its grapes beyond industry
standards and then adds concentrates,” according to Stratmann.
“We
are concerned with all the event centers at wineries in the Sonoma Valley,”
reported Kathy Pons of Valley of the Moon Alliance.
“They
are no longer merely ag., having become hospitality centers. I want true
agriculture to survive, which is cultivating the soil.”
“In
2002 we challenged a giant resort. They had to do an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR), which we challenged in court,” Pons said. Though the court eventually
denied the group’s lawsuit, they slowed down the project, which the worsened
economic situation in 2008 stalled.
This is the plan for our Laguna de Santa Rosa. |
That
resort, which includes a winery with events, was recently bought by a Chinese
holding company for $41 million. Another Chinese corporation has also bought
property in the Sonoma Valley. With the rise of its middle class, the huge
Chinese market for California wines is expanding. Most of Big Wine on
California’s North Coast is owned by outside investors.
“CHAINSAW
WINE” SIGNS AND BUMPER STICKERS
“We
are science-based,” reported Chris Poehlmann of Friends of the Gualala River,
which extends from Mendocino into Sonoma County. “We approach things through
legislation, including dealing with general plans and zoning. We’ve been
successful with legal challenges, forcing EIRs. Our major concern has been the
conversion of forests into vineyards.”
With
respect to the media, Poehlmann suggested, “Be creative. For example, make ‘chainsaw
wine’ signs and bumper stickers.” They have been fighting an 18,000-acre
Preservation Ranch project.
“Big
Wine is a Big Problem,” reported Warren Watkins, who arrived directly from a
celebration of the Russian River. Groups throughout the North Coast have been
showing the acclaimed new documentary “The Russian River: All Rivers” to
sell-out audiences. It includes substantial footage and interviews about the
damage that wineries do to watersheds.
It takes a lot of grapes. |
Watkins
spoke for Healdsburg Citizens for Sustainable Solutions, which has helped mobilized
hundreds of residents to attend various governmental meetings. He noted that
wine tourism creates extra demands for water. “Healdsburg and Sonoma have been
ordered by the state to cut their water use more than any other city in Sonoma
County. These are the two biggest tourist towns in the County.”
“This
is a regional issue,” commented Greenbelt Alliance’s Teri Shore. “Our groups
must look at community separators, to preserve the open spaces and greenbelts
between our cities. Right now I'm focused on renewing community separators policies in
Sonoma. We need
to examine the bigger picture and work together.”
CALISTOGA
MEETING ENDS, THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES
The
six-hour gathering concluded with an evening session on issues such as a
mission statement and the group’s name. Members of Preserve Rural Sonoma County
were present. Its mission statement includes the following: “Our mission is to
promote limits on the encroachment of large wine and spirits processing
complexes/events centers and their negative impacts upon residential
neighborhoods and inappropriate rural areas.”
Four Counties Network (FCN) was the
tentative name agreed upon to identify the collaboration of these diverse
groups in distinct counties. It is a working name that may change. It
signifies the desire to mobilize a mass movement into a united struggle to
ensure the preservation of the rural nature of these neighboring North Coast
California counties, which includes their historic agrarian cultures.
“Four
County Network members have common concerns regarding impact,” noted Napa’s former
winery executive Robert Dwyer. “We are united by out-of-control negative
impacts upon our regional resources. We are not going away. Network member
organizations plan to monitor, challenge, and participate in future land use
policy decisions in the region.”
Folsom Lake - 2011 and 2014 |
Since
it takes about 30 gallons of water to produce one glass of wine, extensive
water use by wineries as events centers was a major concern of the gathering.
After reading a report on the meeting, geologist Jane Nielson, Ph.D., of the
Sonoma County Water Coalition wrote the following in an email:
“The
US Geological Survey’s 8-year study of groundwater under the Santa Rosa Plain
showed an annual deficit of 3,300 acre-ft (just over a billion gallons) per
year, due mostly to agricultural and rural residential pumping from wells,
which the County has permitted with no limitation. The County permits more and
more and more water extraction by new wineries, distilleries, and event centers
by large wine-making concerns.”
“How
many wineries and wine-based entertainment centers does one firm really need?”
asked geologist Dr. Nielson.
For
Further Information: www.facebook.com/preserveruralsonoma
county and preserveruralsonomacounty.org.
NapaVision2050@gmail.com
(Dr. Shepherd Bliss {3sb@comcast.net}
teaches college, farms, has contributed to 24 books, and works with the Apple
Roots Group.)
SAVE THE RUSSIAN RIVER @ THE RIALTO...
The fight against the Dairyman Event Center & Wine/Distilling Factory is heating up.
With 62 winery proposals right now in Sonoma County for new or expanded wineries with events, it is going to take a fierce groundswell of countywide community effort to fight the Napafication of Sonoma County.
We are working hard behind the scenes to try to change some of the zoning regulations that have allowed this rampant overdevelopment and erosion of the rural nature of our home. In addition, we are gathering experts to review the Dairyman application and will be participating in the scoping sessions that shape the issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
• Please consider becoming a volunteer and or donating to our effort! Click here http://preserveruralsonomacounty.org/donate/ to donate through our website. Email us if you have talents to share (writing, sign making, attending official meetings when the time comes, research, etc.)
• Join us for our special benefit event June 16. Get your tickets now as this film sells out every screening! Click here to order your tickets. http://35706.formovietickets.com:2235/T.ASP?WCI=BT&Page=PickTickets&SHOWID=31642
Thank you for your support and help! Please forward this to your friends and spread the word!
Padi Selwyn, Co-chair
Preserve Rural Sonoma County
Like us on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/preserveruralsonomacounty
Visit our website at - http://www.preserveruralsonomacounty.org
Saturday, May 9, 2015
A NOTE FROM JANE NIELSON...
This month SCCA is beginning its new Kortum Legacy Lecture Series, a quarterly educational lecture and lunch for Sonoma County's grassroots environmental community, and support of SCCA’s efforts that promote environmental programs and continue political support for them.
The first of these lectures, including lunch provided by the Ceres Community Project, on May 15, 2013, at 11:30 AM at the Finley Community Center in Santa Rosa.
Our inaugural speaker is Dr. Devra Davis, an internationally-known researcher and educator on environmental pollution. Dr. Davis’s book, “When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution," was recently nominated for a National Book Award.
The attached flyer provides a link for purchasing tickets. I hope to see you there.
Best Wishes,
Jane
Best Wishes,
Jane
NOTE: Since the links in the content below will not work, you can visit those links here:
Buy tickets: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/1558957
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Sonoma-County-Conservation-Action/96804183624
Monday, May 4, 2015
CITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS BIKE TRAILS...
City Council meeting, Tuesday, May 5, starting about 7pm
Meeting held at the Youth Center on Morris St. |
Multiuse trail advocates, we need your support at the next Council meeting to move the proposed trails forward.
At a meeting with the Planning Director and City Manager about what will be presented at the May 5 City Council meeting concerning the multi use trail proposals, they indicated the topic will be limited to addressing the request of the Council from the November meeting. (Recommend a public process and its cost.) It will not be dealing with the trail alignment which brought the NIMBYs out in force to protest. Apparently a consultant will cost in the range of $80,000, a good chunk.
A nice way to get to work. |
The goal for us is to get the money commitment into the budget. Then an RFP can be sent out to trail consultants who will take over the process and eventually make a recommendation to Council. Many, besides us, want some of the City's limited cash. We have to make this need a priority. To do this the City manager simply says, "get many to speak up at the Council meeting, and send lots of letters."
I know it is hard to find the time, it can be boring waiting, it feels uncomfortable to speak, etc. but this is what works. Being there, making your case while the Council is deciding makes a difference. Following below are some messages that I think we should get out and be repeated by many. Also a survey follows.
Detailed information is available at www.SebastopolTrailMakers.org.
Our kids deserve it. |
The trails are needed.
More than anything else this will change the "drive everywhere" culture of Sebastopol, the health and independence of kids, traffic to schools, etc. These trails will add to social life, happiness, and adventure from tots in trailers to elders. Dogs love them too. More than anything else, these trails will make Sebastopol a better place to live. See poll below.
Get our youth started in the habit of going place on their own power. The predominant culture of "drive everywhere" changes most by getting youth and families into the habit of biking and walking. This starts with a safe and enjoyable way to do this.
Bike lanes along Hwy 116 are not a "duplication"
You still ride between parked cars and highway traffic. Until it feels safe, most will not use it. We need a way for all users to ride or walk. Walking along Hwy 116 is unpleasant.
Sebastopol's current situation. |
Below is the result of a poll by Robert Jacobs taken for his campaign. The next biggest concern was traffic congestion at ten points. He asked:
Should we prioritize developing more pedestrian and bicycle improvements and pathways?
40 of 46 people answered affirmatively, or 87% It should be noted that the people that did not answer affirmatively did not answer negatively or even with the undecided. There was no anti bike lane comments. Meaning that the number could even have been higher.
An Oregon community with bike trails; almost every kid rides their bike to school. |
Saturday, May 2, 2015
THE WAGNER FAMILY OF WINES...
Here they are...
Yucking it up while the Laguna de Santa Rosa is sucked dry. |
The Wagner Family. These are the folks behind the proposed Dairyman Winery/Entertainment Center they want to build on top of the Laguna de Santa Rosa.
Below is a link to an article in Wine Spectator.
After reading the the flyer I posted earlier - After looking at those numbers. You can be sure that those figures represent an understatement.
If those outrageous numbers are what they are actually projecting, it scares the hell out of me to imagine what they'll try to get away with.
Please read the article below from the Wine Spectator website...
A MONSTER AT OUR DOORSTEP...
EVERYONE NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS.
The Napafication of Sebastopol is bearing down on us. This facility will change life as we know it for our entire community. PLEASE write to the following officials below to express your concerns and/or outrage that this is even being considered right on top of the Laguna de Santa Rosa.
Thursday, April 23, 2015
RURAL REBELLION IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA...
By Shepherd Bliss
Rural
folk from four Northern California counties came in mid-April to a magical juncture
where the life-giving Russian River empties into the majestic Pacific Ocean.
Though the small, unincorporated village of Jenner is a popular recreational
destination, pleasure was not the intention.
Jenner, CA by Sarah M. Kanzler |
Our
mission was to preserve agrarian lifestyles and environments from further
colonization by industrial wineries. Large corporate wineries--owned mainly by outside
investors--were the main target.
Water
and California’s worsening drought were discussed. Some reported that wells had
gone dry after large wineries dug as much as 1000 feet into the ground to
extract precious, limited water for their factories.
It
takes about 30 gallons of water to make one glass of wine. “Our water is being
exported,” reported one person.
Misleading message. |
FROM
AGRICULTURE TO MONOCULTURE
Sonoma
County currently has 70,000 acres (and growing) of wine grapes and only 12,000
acres of food crops. As grapegrower Bill Shortridge says, “We've
gone from an agriculture that benefitted all, to a monoculture that benefits a
few.” Modifying
an old statement, “One cannot live by wine alone.”
So
what’s the beef? Big Wine controls around 80% of the market in Sonoma County.
They take more than their fair share of the water we all need to survive,
garden, hydrate our families, pets, plants, and farm animals.
Forty
activists from Napa, Sonoma, Lake, and Mendocino counties circled up outside that
afternoon and began describing their diverse local situations. The grill soon
started for the potluck. After an hour and a half, “Let’s eat!” could be heard.
Get rid of weeds and fertilize the crop. |
After
dinner, our numbers had doubled to around 40 for the public part of our time
together. Our host Ken Sund explained why he initiated this gathering, “After
seeing our coastal hills get industrialized, I decided to invite people here.
Jenner has a history of community activism.”
Agriculture to Monoculture. |
Six
people spoke about their respective struggles, mainly with wineries doing
things such as creating event centers, cutting redwood forests, crawling up
hills, snarling traffic by tasting rooms on dangerous, narrow rural roads, hording
limited water supplies, and a host of other problems.
Will Parrish. |
Mendocino
County’s Will Parrish is an investigative reporter, who writes for AVA
(Anderson Valley Advertiser). He is featured in the acclaimed new documentary
“Russian River: All Rivers.” It reveals how the over-proliferation of the wine
industry damages the Russian River watershed. Parrish described the extensive
power of the wine industry in our region and the many ways it influences land
use and other decisions that directly impact people and the environment.
PRESERVE
RURAL SONOMA COUNTY
Former
Sonoma County Planning Commissioner Rue Furch spoke for the new Preserve Rural
Sonoma County. It focuses on the recent application by the Napa Wagner wine
family for the Dairyman Winery and Distillery on the fast-moving, two lane Highway
12, a greenbelt community separator between Santa Rosa and Sebastopol. “It’s
already a commute deadlock on that highway. People back up for miles,” Furch
observed.
Rue Furch. |
“We
need a cost/benefit analysis,” said Furch. “The drought is a tipping point
moment. We know the benefits of agriculture, tourism and tax dollars. We need
to fully understand the costs, such as water use, traffic, air quality, and
changes in land use. We enjoy the benefits
of agriculture and open space, and need to support those while we deal with the
expanding impacts of tourism,” Furch added.
“You
are not alone,” Furch said, citing community groups from around the region. One
of the main accomplishments of this gathering was that participants saw the
similarities and differences in our diverse struggles.
A
primary objection expressed at the meeting was regarding wineries that become
event centers, complete with restaurants. They host all kinds of non-agricultural
events in areas zoned for ag. and as rural. As someone said at another meeting,
“The right to farm is not the right to party.”
BIG
WINE IS OUT OF CONTROL
“The
wine industry is out of control today. It pushes for maximum profit,” explained
Geoff Ellsworth of St. Helena, Napa County. He was raised in a wine family.
“Our town has become an adult spring break. This is like an invasive species.
The big corporations do strip mining.”
“Our
issue is an application by Wild Diamond Vineyard by a Miami developer,”
explained Karl Giovacchini of the Hidden Valley Lake Watershed group. It wants
to border a subdivision of 6000 people. “Water issues are key for us. We are a
small, poor county and vineyards represent a lot of money coming in. But they
top off mountains and draw water from our limited aquifers.” As wineries run
out of land and water in Sonoma and Napa, they move to nearby Lake and
Mendocino, buying cheaper land, to further colonize them.
Giovacchini
addressed the “burn-out issue.” He reported on a five-year struggle against a
vineyard. One of the things that can work against burn-out is the development of
friendships, where people support each other as they work against vineyard and
winery over-extension. The Jenner gathering contributed to building community and
sharing information across county lines, thus making new allies.
"You can make water into wine, but
you can’t make wine into water,” is a tag line that Giovacchini’s partner
Alicia Lee Farnsworth came up for their website Vineyard Wine Watch.
Audience members asked questions and
made comments after the six panelists spoke. “Development in general and its impacts on
our natural resources must be attended to,” commented Charlotte Williams of
Citizens for Green Community in Calistoga. After meeting in Lake and Sonoma,
the third meeting of the group is scheduled for Calistoga in Napa for May 2.
BIG
WINE VIOLATIONS
Paul Hobbs clear-cutting of old Redwoods is typical of vineyard operations. |
Big
Wine regularly violates its permits and other rules, and is seldom held
accountable. Dairyman settled for $1 million with Napa in 2013 for bottling 20
times as much as their permit. “Bad apple” Paul Hobbs settled for $100,000 with
Sonoma County for three violations, including clear cutting redwood trees and
soil erosion, for which he was liable for millions of dollars in fines.
It
is illegal to have restaurants in areas zoned for agriculture, yet Big Wine
does it regularly. St. Francis even brags about doing so on its website: http://www.stfranciswinery.com/culinary/wine-food-pairing/.
They flaunt their
excessive power.
As one
person at the meeting said, “If
it walks like a restaurant and it quacks like a restaurant, it is a
restaurant.”
“We
favor town-centered development. That is the purpose of small towns. We are
losing that,” mentioned one person.
(Shepherd
Bliss {3sb@comcast.net} teaches college, farms, and has contributed
to 24 books.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)